Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Aug 2019 20:45:40 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 239832] security/secpanel hard-coding of "gnome-terminal" fails under mate-only installation
Message-ID:  <bug-239832-6497-EwXv8YGdAf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-239832-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-239832-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239832

--- Comment #24 from Jim D. <radicleparticles@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Walter Schwarzenfeld from comment #20)

If the port Makefile doesn't specify minimum TCL/TK required for Secpanel a=
nd
someone tries to run an installed Secpanel under TCL/TK < 8.0, they will ge=
t a
warning message. That is OK as it would inform the user that they need to
install a suitable version of TCL/TK. I just thought that if the TCL/TK min=
imum
version check was in the Makefile, then a user will know up front (sooner,
quicker?) that they will require a newer version of TCL/TK.

Not having a version check within the Makefile doesn't affect the port
installation as there is no code assembly/compilation performed. Having the
TCL/TK version check in the Makefile would then be "convenience" addition.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239832-6497-EwXv8YGdAf>