From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 09:25:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7253C53E for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091A6807 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:25:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=I5jZZfTJqmJHBA7k/rtQz+nJLptALI+liPjTtTswxAA=; b=xVic/NmXOuVuvINYv/5+T6+ArYRPvcjOburpbHOWCNcDr6aGgJUhNPpRZW8vL/R4hvJnJBpWrCRFSnEWatUsx/t54/SjsSNdMBYTiStVd0HN3s0MkquN9hGYSgsXMhDa; Received: from [122.129.203.50] (port=13027 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr3Wz-001UDE-PD; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:25:38 -0700 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:25:34 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20130104162534.16eec216@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: References: <50E1D012.1040004@missouri.edu> <20121231175808.GA1399@glenbarber.us> <6817fb4c15659b194cc658b1dfa58a31.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <148920333.20121231235441@takeda.tk> <50E3444D.1060307@mu.org> <6794891ed487f426d2c5d0108648f1e0.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20130102123148.1f493d00@X220.ovitrap.com> <50E45A03.9080600@FreeBSD.org> <20130103075037.130afa18@X220.ovitrap.com> <50E533F1.5020006@FreeBSD.org> <818DF1F6-9C5B-4BDE-867B-ECD8C60E5659@punkt.de> <50E5CC1C.7070803@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:25:41 -0000 Hi, On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:38:05 +0100 "Patrick M. Hausen" wrote: > Am 03.01.2013 um 19:21 schrieb Matthew Seaman > : > > On 03/01/2013 17:48, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > >> I'm a bit reluctant to installing svn on every system that needs > >> source updates. Are there more lightweight ways? > > > > freebsd-update(8) > > > > which is what 'make update' will run by default and in the absence > > of any configuration to use other mechanisms. > > > Sorry for being too terse in my first post. Seems like I should have > a closer look at freebsd-update. "Of course" I have lines like this > in my /etc/make.conf on each machine that I update from sources: no matter, you showed how deeply this integration was up to the point that you did not notice it anymore. You also showed that there was a reliable infrastructure available which served you for years without any problems. What will happen after the jump into the cold water? Erich