From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 5 21:17:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA25672 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 21:17:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA25661 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 21:17:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA21150; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 13:47:14 +0930 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) id NAA01600; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 13:46:50 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <19981006134649.X27781@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 13:46:49 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: iyengar , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: siyengar@mc.hl.siemens.de Subject: Re: sio1 problem, ppp problem and 3com 3c905B-TX problem References: <001401bdf0de$11bc4900$f90e2599@fvn6s> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <001401bdf0de$11bc4900$f90e2599@fvn6s>; from iyengar on Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 09:01:58PM -0700 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Format autorecovered at freebie.lemis.com] On Monday, 5 October 1998 at 21:01:58 -0700, iyengar wrote: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > From: Greg Lehey > To: iyengar ; > Date: Sunday, October 04, 1998 10:01 PM > Subject: Re: sio1 problem, ppp problem and 3com 3c905B-TX problem > > >> On Sunday, 4 October 1998 at 21:14:22 -0700, iyengar wrote: >>> Hi Friends, >>> >>> I was wondering if anyone could give me a few pointers with 3 specific >>> problems I am running into. >>> >>> I have a new Dell Dimension XPS R400. It has an internal modem >>> which windows shows as hooked up to COM2. I checked the IRQ=3 and >>> the port address=0x100. The IO range is 0x100 - 0x107. I changed >>> the sio1 port address using userconfig from the default to 0x100. >>> >>> FreeBSD (2.2.7) comes up with the following messages : >>> >>> Sio1: Configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>> Sio1: irq maps 0x1 0x1 0x1 0x1 >>> Sio1: Probe failed test(s): 1 4 6 7 9 >>> Sio1: not found at 0x100 >> >> Is there anything else in the dmesg output which would help? >> Theoretically you might be suffering from the sio problems described >> at http://www.lemis.com/serial-port-patch.html, but I haven't heard of >> that on Dells (though of course the fact that it's a modem might >> change things). The I/O addresses are definitely funny; normally a >> serial port is at 0x3f8 (primary) and 0x2f8 (secondary). Could it be >> that Microsoft is lying? >> >> If it's the serial port bug described on the web page, it's fixed both >> in 2.2-STABLE and 3.0 (which looks like it's what you want anyway). > > Thanks for the replies. I initially left the default 0x2f8 address > for the sio1 ( com2) port and found that FreeBSD did not find this > on booting. Yes, I rather suspected that you might have tried this first. > I then went back to check for the location and found that MS windows > 98 reported it at 0x100. This is a very funny addresss. I'm quite prepared to believe that Microsoft makes claims like that when it can't find anything at all. > It does find COM1 at 3xf8 and I am now using a 28.8 modem hooked up > to that port externally while I have a 56k flex on the inside of the > machine sitting idle since it is not found by the OS. As far as I > can tell, there are no other helpful hints on dmesg regarding this > issue. Com1 is found and com2 is not. What does the BIOS say when you enter setup? Also, do you have a manual for the modem? Is it a standard Dell part, or an add-on (including something sold to you and preinstalled when you bought the box)? > BTW, I did an "upgrade" from 2.2.6 to 2.2.7 instead of fully loading > the OS. There were several reasons for this. I had a dedicated Hard > Drive for FreeBSD that I "moved" from an older PC to this one and I > did not want to remove the directory structure and some changes I > had made to some Packages on 2.2.6. Could this be one reason that > the OS is not functioning optimally? No, I can't think that. The upgrade installation doesn't build a kernel, so you'll still have the standard kernel. What does 'uname -a' say? > As far as conflicts go - I have only two and these are related to > the PS2 mouse and the sysconsole for which the message says > "conflict allowed". I have removed the unwanted drivers in > Userconfig. I do not have any conflicting irqs in the NETWORKING or > the other sections of Userconfig. You don't even need to do this. What does your complete dmesg output look like (see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html if you have difficulty collecting the output). Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message