From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 3 10:54:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA03067 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:54:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA03039 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:54:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA24284; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 13:15:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 13:15:25 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199803031815.NAA24284@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Cc: Terry Lambert , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patches in support of security In-Reply-To: References: <199803010139.SAA02325@usr04.primenet.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > This looks useful. (or at least is a useful first step) While some > policies may be enforced with creative firewall rules, these patches > provide a clean interface at the application level. This seems potentially acceptable. A couple of nits: 1) The socket option in question is clearly also applicable to UDP sockets (and those of any other IP-based protocol). It should be an IP-level option, not a TCP-level one. 2) Read style(9). -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message