From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 06:05:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA2E16A429 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC53C43D46 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:05:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so768771wxc for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:05:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=g3Y4X+NLX1gcDooLiyzP6raU5ZQ5eIQcka24SbRd3HPo3Wol0DOIyTc/dYKSNnUDO5zt+ftws8wbfFfAwq1Axb6HlW8I6nx5YLuRRa27hvrFgVG/QR5WovzjLuf19Me4fHUpx1WKMS2dD2zZy7isp7JpLB/kWzN1scQf+Pk1yjE= Received: by 10.70.63.5 with SMTP id l5mr2437473wxa; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:05:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i38sm2224770wxd.2005.11.14.22.05.42; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:05:43 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Jiawei Ye Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:56:16 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200511142145.05316.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511142156.16849.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does security/amavisd-new depend on db3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:05:44 -0000 On Monday 14 November 2005 22:01, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On 11/15/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > Looking at security/amavisd-new and databases/p5-BerkeleyDB it looks like > > you have to make sure WITH_BDB_VER=42 is applied to > > databases/p5-BerkeleyDB, not security/amavisd-new, is this the case? > > in pkgtools.conf: > MAKE_ARGS = { > 'databases/p5-BerkeleyDB' => 'WITH_BDB_VER=42', > > in pm-020.conf > databases/p5-BerkeleyDB|WITH_BDB_VER=42| > > > WITH_BDB_VER=42 changes nothing I can see for amavisd-new: > > > > amavisd-new>make -V RUN_DEPENDS WITH_BDB_VER=42 > > > > /usr/ports/databases/p5-BerkeleyDB > > > > amavisd-new>make -V RUN_DEPENDS > > > > but for p5-BerkeleyDB it does: > > > > p5-BerkeleyDB>make -V LIB_DEPENDS WITH_BDB_VER=42 > > > > db-4.2.2:/usr/ports/databases/db42 > > > > p5-BerkeleyDB>make -V LIB_DEPENDS > > > > db3.3:/usr/ports/databases/db3 > > > > -Mike > > It is correct when you invoke it manually, but I rebuilt p5-BerkeleyDB > numerous times already and still get wrong dependancies for > amavisd-new. > > > Jiawei Maybe there is a bug in portmanager, I'll test it on these two programs and let you know what I find later. -Mike