From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Jun 30 9:26:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from palrel3.hp.com (palrel3.hp.com [156.153.255.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC1137B986; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@cup.hp.com) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel3.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063C87B4; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id JAA17554; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <395CCA42.53199592@cup.hp.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:26:42 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mark W. Krentel" Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, mbendiks@eunet.no Subject: Re: panic running linux binaries from ext2fs References: <200006300640.CAA01502@dreamscape.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Mark W. Krentel" wrote: > > I don't normally have any Freebsd binaries on my Linux partitions. > But as a test, I copied a few and ran them. It wasn't a real stress > test, but ls, emacs, xv and xsnow all seemed to run ok on ext2fs. > So, I guess that's not the problem. Thanks. > It seems to require the combination of a Linux binary and ext2fs. > And it's not a complicated Linux binary. I can produce the panic > with Linux's ls. On the other hand, I have successfully run the > Linux versions of emacs and netscape, as long as all the files are > on ufs. ls might be a special case in that it may have too much FS dependent code. A kernel trace should tell us more... > Are there any configuration options for the Linuxulator that I might > have set wrong? I blew away /compat/linux and reinstalled linux_base, > just to make sure it wasn't any additional libs that were the problem. You shouldn't need any options. > Is Linux emulation or ext2fs sensitive to any kernel options (other > than EXT2FS)? I'm not using soft updates, if that matters. The linuxulator currently still depends on COMPAT_43, but that's about it, I guess. If you can send us the last dozen of lines of a ktrace/truss session, then we can start working on this... -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message