From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 22 07:38:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5D216A4CE
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 22 May 2004 07:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E1243D1F
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 22 May 2004 07:38:39 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id 7EFA55318; Sat, 22 May 2004 16:37:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id E760D530A; Sat, 22 May 2004 16:37:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id D1B2833CAA; Sat, 22 May 2004 16:37:09 +0200 (CEST)
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405212355001.18976-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 16:37:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405212355001.18976-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
	(Daniel Eischen's message of "Sat, 22 May 2004 00:05:31 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <xzp4qq8h6ju.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:38:40 -0000

Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes:
> Yet another also, MySQL uses scope system threads by default
> instead of scope process threads.  Scope process threads seem
> to perform better.

Excuse me for digressing, but do you threads guys have some kind of
occupational nerve damage which prevents you from using correct
grammar?  Why does everybody insist on talking about "scope system
threads" and "scope process threads" instead of system-scope and
process-scope threads?

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no