From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org  Mon Oct 24 15:19:54 2016
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C252DC1F41C;
 Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3CD99C;
 Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C543207BF;
 Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:19:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213])
 by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:19:53 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to:cc
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject
 :date:in-reply-to:references; s=smtpout; bh=Fep2fCwKM46IuFdDnZoq
 F+UhSMg=; b=VEGMpBLMOHrRlL+slSJkOOrAM4W42RPvTfuYuX7hvcr5bdEMXQmm
 OxdzDhndbb/Vx9of5ISrnz2fpPE9+re1DUSQRTlh2TXnuSqnRHbC4vHPLPp5IBd8
 g1W6CpK2GA7TrHyCkPco2hj6HxmCdCKf7seDr5YamKdPUkQrEVW0x6o=
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99)
 id 0828B2E6CF; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:19:53 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1477322392.268672.765593297.7D9E36A5@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: p6wrAM49Lp4Rd6y+N18N/1TSypeivcy4i29EnjPrwjD2 1477322392
From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To: v@fatpipi.com
Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-92c67c5a
Subject: Re: svn commit: r424573 - in head/www: . varnish5 varnish5/files
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:19:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAB_qb69qeZUb45bne_E8-=EMGwxeSsMPaQBf4GsVxC87YD088A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201610241516.u9OFGpEo078578@repo.freebsd.org>
 <CAB_qb69qeZUb45bne_E8-=EMGwxeSsMPaQBf4GsVxC87YD088A@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>, 
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:19:54 -0000



On Mon, Oct 24, 2016, at 10:18, Vanilla Hsu wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> any plan to make whole varnish-libvmod ports to support varnish5?
> 
> thanks.
> 

Yes, but I haven't decided *how*. I'm considering making port OPTIONS
that change dependency between www/varnish4 and www/varnish5, but it
feels very dirty.

-- 
  Mark Felder
  ports-secteam member
  feld@FreeBSD.org