Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:05:42 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC4 AMD64 binutils / arm-eabi-binutils locales conflict Message-ID: <44sit2a5hl.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjnQyadkYnZY8pjSKvMexw03mNFASUy4RV1aavG=ukyxEw@mail.gmail.com> (cederom@tlen.pl's message of "Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:52:00 %2B0100") References: <CAFYkXjnQyadkYnZY8pjSKvMexw03mNFASUy4RV1aavG=ukyxEw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> writes: > There still is a conflict of binutils and arm-eabi-binutils in binary > packages / ports - they install locale files into same destination. > This blocks ARM development and/or other tools that depends on > binutils. Please note that binutils are also dependency of various > other packages (i.e. openjdk). I'd have to check what I did at work, but I think I just used a different PREFIX to install to a different place. My cross-compile build system needs the tools specified in environment variables anyway, so I don't even need to adjust my path.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44sit2a5hl.fsf>