From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 21 19:07:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B97D16A46B; Mon, 21 May 2007 19:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA9813C48A; Mon, 21 May 2007 19:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4LJ6QN6097237; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:06:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id l4LJ6QM6097236; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:06:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:06:26 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-ID: <20070521190626.GA97019@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200705211144.l4LBiEHY098477@repoman.freebsd.org> <4651E084.1020605@FreeBSD.org> <20070521185032.GA1059@garage.freebsd.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070521185032.GA1059@garage.freebsd.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: "Ralf S. Engelschall" , cvs-src@freebsd.org, Doug Barton , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/rc.d hostid X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:07:05 -0000 On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 08:50:32PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > I'm also not happy with using csh(1), but I agree with rse@'s change in > general. Are you aware that signal handling appears to be messed up in (t)csh? Hopefully, this change doesn't render someones system as unbootable. http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/tcsh-bugs/2007-May/thread.html -- Steve