Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:54:45 +0100
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de>
Cc:        Maho Nakata <maho@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Message-ID:  <20131203215445.68b9bc4e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <529E3E6A.2090107@janh.de>
References:  <77CB2B92-216A-4C80-B033-7E582B5F0DFC@FreeBSD.org> <20131112165422.GA2939@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <E0FE40D9-726C-4501-B31A-3622510C1C68@FreeBSD.org> <20131112175556.GA3319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131112201922.GA4330@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131113173143.Horde.a-9M7JQ_vHo3tpDIMsGK6g1@webmail.df.eu> <CAFMmRNxk25AJ3TMuceSG=EmL3qSE9Xhk_wpL5pAD8YvZrA6gkg@mail.gmail.com> <5283CA3C.3080201@FreeBSD.org> <352D9465-9840-43F0-A3A9-327DC12B0967@FreeBSD.org> <B2F7EDA4-DF34-4D5D-B995-5ADA1A9898D8@FreeBSD.org> <20131114144555.GA22093@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <52963A90.4000201@janh.de> <20131127204556.2974a3f5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20131201150640.12ea18c8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <529E3E6A.2090107@janh.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> >>> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
> >>> anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard
> >>> options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with:
> >>>
> >>> env LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc++.so.1 octave
> >>>
> >>> Some very light testing indicates that it is working. Of course, this is
> >>> not ideal.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe this gives a clue how to fix the octave port properly.
> >>
> >> I have a preliminary patch for math/octave that I wanted to test on
> >> redports first, but it is down at the moment so here it is.
> > 
> > The tests were successful:
> > https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201105316-94935/ (octave)
> > https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201115701-22333/ (octave-forge-base)
> > The octave logs also contain the results of running the regression-test
> > target.  The output is the same on all FreeBSD versions.
> > 
> > The problem is that USE_FORTRAN=yes implies USE_GCC=yes.  This means
> > the C++ code in math/octave is compiled with gcc46/libstdc++ which
> > does not work if dependencies have been built with clang/libc++.
> > 
> > The patch copies the USE_FORTRAN=yes logic from Mk/bsd.gcc.mk into a
> > new file Mk/Uses/fortran.mk.  It allows ports to use a Fortran compiler
> > together with the base system C/C++ compiler.
> 
> With the patch, math/octave fails for me on 9.2-RELEASE/amd64 and
> 10.0-BETA4/amd64 with:
> 
> checking for amd64-portbld-freebsd(9.2|10.0)-gfortran... f77
> checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no
> checking whether f77 accepts -g... no
> checking how to get verbose linking output from f77... configure:
> WARNING: compilation failed
> 
> checking for Fortran 77 libraries of f77...
> checking for dummy main to link with Fortran 77 libraries... none
> checking for Fortran 77 name-mangling scheme... configure: error: in
> `/usr/ports/math/octave/work/octave-3.6.4':
> configure: error: cannot compile a simple Fortran program
> 
> Full logs attached (each with and without your patch).
> 
> In both cases, it tries to use f77, while the original port uses gfortran46.
> 
> Any idea what is wrong on my system?

Do you define FC in make.conf maybe?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131203215445.68b9bc4e>