From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 16 02:39:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA24996 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 02:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deathstar.ml.org (adrian@deathstar.ml.org [203.62.152.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA24969 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 02:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost) by deathstar.ml.org (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA00937 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:40:38 +0800 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:40:38 +0800 (WST) From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: IP tunnel between a FreeBSD box and a cisco. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi guys. Has anyone setup an IP tunnel between a FreeBSD box, and a cisco router (specifically the 4000-series router, running IOS 10.x (I don't know the exact version - its not mine :) ) ? Why? I want to do BGP between our gateway box running FreeBSD/gated, and a 4000.. but there is a 1003 in the way. Multi-hop BGP works fine, but since the 1003 doesn't know the routes itself, it blindly sends stuff to its default gateway (being some other router). Note 64k is for this link, and 64k is for another client (otherwise I would have just had the default route via the link I'm BGPing with :-) Diagram: 4000 ---64k-- ISDN --- [ 1003 ] -- ethernet -- [GATEWAY] | 64k (another client) and I want the 4000 and the gateway box to have a "tunnel" going which I can then do BGP over. Thanks, -- Adrian Chadd | "Unix doesn't stop you from doing | stupid things because that would | stop you from doing clever things"