From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:03:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296DE16A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257FE44047; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:01:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB8J0ntx071142; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:00:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB8J0mxU071141; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:00:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200312081900.hB8J0mxU071141@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200312081004.18669.sam@errno.com> To: Sam Leffler Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:00:48 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 cc: Erwin Lansing cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of wi(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 19:03:04 -0000 It seems Sam Leffler wrote: > > > My MA401 w/ later station firmware (1.3.4) works fine. The previous wi > > > problems were with Lucent cards and appear to have been resolved. > > > > No! lucents even with the newest firmware 8.x.x still doesn't work in > > either adhoc mode. I can get it to contact an AP but thats all.. > > My last testing of wi for Prism and Lucent both worked with adhoc mode. I am > aware of your issues with adhoc mode for atwi cards. I will test again but, > as usual, details are more useful than "it don't work". Well, I put two of these: wi0: at port 0x100-0x13f irq 11 function 0 co nfig 1 on pccard0 wi0: 802.11 address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx wi0: using Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (8.10.1) wi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps in laptops running 5.2-soontobe, and they can't find each other nor talk adhoc to the other even if one is running win2K. Running both in win2k works and so does talking to an AP. The problems with atwi that you are referring to are very semilar so to me it suggests our 80211 code which is common has something todo with the problems at hand. -Søren .. but it works under windows!!