Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 00:13:15 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I rather see the tcp/ip stack fixed than vat patched Message-ID: <199712270813.AAA00270@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Dec 1997 23:26:38 PST." <97Dec26.232638pst.177484@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tnks Bill , I will wait till you get back. Regards, Amancio > Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> wrote: > >Bill care to comment? > > For the first patch, I fail to see how adding a setsockopt to set > IP_MULTICAST_LOOP to its default value when creating a new socket > changes anything. For the second patch, if that's how the kernel > behaves, then vat should deal with it and although the kernel should be > fixed, it makes sense to make vat deal with earlier kernels. I don't > have a test machine available to me now, so if you want anything more > from me it'll have to wait until I get back to CA. > > Bill >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712270813.AAA00270>