From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 5 12:24:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA29818 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from konig.elte.hu (konig.elte.hu [157.181.6.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA29811 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sebesty@localhost) by konig.elte.hu (8.8.3/8.7.3/7s) with SMTP id VAA22588; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 21:23:15 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 21:23:14 +0200 (MET DST) From: Zoltan Sebestyen X-Sender: sebesty@konig To: Dan Busarow cc: FreeBSD questions mailinglist Subject: Re: ed0 device timeout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, That idea unfortunately didn't work for me. The kernel recognizes the card, but doesn't assignes an interface. Copyright (c) 1992-1997 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. . . . Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0 rev 2 on pci0:0 chip1 rev 2 on pci0:7:0 chip2 rev 2 on pci0:7:1 vga0 rev 64 int a irq 9 on pci0:10 pci0:11: vendor=0x10ec, device=0x8029, class=network (ethernet) \n int a irq 12 [no driver assigned] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sebestyen Zoltan It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up. szoli@caesar.elte.hu But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?