From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 01:53:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3899116A4CE; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 01:53:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F62643D2F; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 01:53:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2F9x36K003431; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:59:03 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:59:03 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040315.185903.596518725.chat95@mac.com> To: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <4052773D.5010507@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200403130236.i2D2atOx068933@repoman.freebsd.org> <4052773D.5010507@fillmore-labs.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: maho@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice-1.1 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:53:46 -0000 In Message-ID: <4052773D.5010507@fillmore-labs.com> Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > I guess you just borked the comments of the lang/openoffice-1.1 ports. lang/ means for example japanese/openoffice-1.1 ? okay, I'll backout soon. > Wouldn't it be better to come up with a patch and port it for review, > than using the FreeBSD CVS for development? No. currently I cannot do it. Since OOo is huge port, comparable to entire FreeBSD sourcecode. Maintaining this port is extremely difficult if there's no such kind of thing (e.g., patch without IssueZilla ticket), we are soon confused what are committed or what aren't. My standpoint is reduce OOo patches to build as far as possible(remember, there were over 120 patches to build), however, still we have many (minor or major) problems, so we have ~10 patches. IMHO, development speed of OOo is extremely fast. to catch up with it, such kind of things are quite necessary. thanks for your understanding. --nakata maho