From owner-freebsd-standards Fri Mar 1 1: 3:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [216.254.138.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19B137B402 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:03:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mike@localhost) by espresso.q9media.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g218vu515772; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 03:57:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike) Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 03:57:56 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft To: Kyle Martin Cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wc(1) patch for review Message-ID: <20020301035756.C7544@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20020301023255.A39275@marvin.idsi.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020301023255.A39275@marvin.idsi.net>; from mkm@ieee.org on Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:32:55AM -0600 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kyle Martin writes: > heres a patch to take care of wc's -m argument, option, which evedently is the same as -c. i left -c in their but it could easily be taken out No, this isn't quite right. See the rationale in POSIX.1-2001 which describes the difference between these options. Also, this task has already been assigned to Tim Robbins. In future, please check the project status board to reduce duplicate work. http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/c99/ Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message