From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 30 17:50:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from smtp11.bellglobal.com (smtp11.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D6715927 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:50:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu) Received: from localhost.nowhere (ppp6527.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.208.119]) by smtp11.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA24289; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 20:52:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.nowhere (8.9.3/8.9.1) id UAA94314; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 20:50:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 20:50:30 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Matthew Dillon Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -stable vs -current (was Re: solid NFS patch #6... ) Message-ID: <19990430205030.A94231@mad> References: <199904302208.RAA07422@home.dragondata.com> <199904302352.QAA41119@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <199904302352.QAA41119@apollo.backplane.com>; from Matthew Dillon on Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:52:58PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:52:58PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I expect the 3.2 release to be a really good release. I seem to recall that 2.2.x wasn't even called "-stable" until 2.2.2. That .2 release is exactly where 3.x is right now... -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message