From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 00:27:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF931065670 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421488FC12 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so5957620qyk.13 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:27:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=121CO2c21tOW9dlFE3tA1GYLt9Jp3xepRKUCiJybna0=; b=afBC+HmdaILKzzBklxmS4SUsY1QVueGkP3/kicPUOFpbGeRLK/4Zzjl3MjHyc7j8vv Tgi5w7tmZq0EGd2izLiYnRiBB+JXEXw3WOpE7eoqmYcDmhOhCqWmcfbnCA/Fqef81ZlA n+ejRG/Ewpjc1d5b2ju3U3/ceG1rOxiT4uPlA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.218.132 with SMTP id hq4mr1520463qab.192.1316392021525; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.37.83 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:27:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110919002304.219780@gmx.com> References: <20110919002304.219780@gmx.com> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:27:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Dieter BSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: checksum offload X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:27:02 -0000 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Dieter BSD wrote: >> The data sheet for intel 82576 advertises IP TX/RX checksum offload >> but the driver does not set CSUM_IP in ifp->if_hwassist. Does this mean that >> driver (and chip) do not support IP TX checksum offload or the support for >> TX is not yet included in the driver? > > The first question is "is checksum offload a good idea?" > There is less protection against errors. This assumes firmware flaws, right? Albeit, it also does confuse some software like tcpdump. -Garrett