Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 08:42:45 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george@m5p.com> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Last flavorless revision? Message-ID: <6ebfaf48-4869-cb28-599a-3d50313dc3a7@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <a8bc128c-384d-94b4-909b-3c625fc8e9c9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20171201200751.GA17979@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <31DBA0EB-539A-4BA5-9CF7-4EDF4CAF9205@adamw.org> <20171201204348.GA1135@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <eb6472e1-ef6b-d516-bb0c-81b27f07154b@chrullrich.net> <20171202172854.GA44592@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <d176d4c0-1067-9c9b-c8d6-70e9aadd0e41@p-o.co.uk> <20171204173346.GA65535@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <a8bc128c-384d-94b4-909b-3c625fc8e9c9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--jXSgc0mtWdFuL9sD9bVAL7gtOnW7uHkWc
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="AbVxtNKwNvWvjNbwr2LsBNEqGJUC1qkQQ";
protected-headers="v1"
From: George Mitchell <george@m5p.com>
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <6ebfaf48-4869-cb28-599a-3d50313dc3a7@m5p.com>
Subject: Re: Last flavorless revision?
References: <20171201200751.GA17979@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
<31DBA0EB-539A-4BA5-9CF7-4EDF4CAF9205@adamw.org>
<20171201204348.GA1135@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
<eb6472e1-ef6b-d516-bb0c-81b27f07154b@chrullrich.net>
<20171202172854.GA44592@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
<d176d4c0-1067-9c9b-c8d6-70e9aadd0e41@p-o.co.uk>
<20171204173346.GA65535@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
<a8bc128c-384d-94b4-909b-3c625fc8e9c9@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <a8bc128c-384d-94b4-909b-3c625fc8e9c9@FreeBSD.org>
--AbVxtNKwNvWvjNbwr2LsBNEqGJUC1qkQQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 12/05/17 03:13, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 04/12/2017 =C3=A0 18:33, Steve Kargl a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
>> [...]
>> This does not document the change in ports/UPDATING. FreeBSD
>> users have been told to check {src/ports}/UPDATING for 20+
>> years. A change that fundamentally changes the way users=20
>> interact with ports/ should document.
>=20
>=20
> This did not change anything for the users, so there was nothing in
> UPDATING.
I think there is some cognitive dissonance here on who the users are.
I would be astonished if any end user of a FreeBSD system had ever
read the contents of /usr/ports/UPDATING except for the system
administrator, and administrators are definitely affected (to say
the least). -- George
--AbVxtNKwNvWvjNbwr2LsBNEqGJUC1qkQQ--
--jXSgc0mtWdFuL9sD9bVAL7gtOnW7uHkWc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=56UI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--jXSgc0mtWdFuL9sD9bVAL7gtOnW7uHkWc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6ebfaf48-4869-cb28-599a-3d50313dc3a7>