From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 22:45:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A17D2; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:8200::42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 884AA2B51; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.42.129] (d66-183-220-167.bchsia.telus.net [66.183.220.167] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r97MjOJS025288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:45:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: rcs is gone? From: Lyndon Nerenberg In-Reply-To: <6CEFF9B8-A62A-4616-A0FF-BDDDE1027A7E@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:45:23 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <132C8A43-E822-49C3-A1EA-493A40449AD4@orthanc.ca> References: <29D748F4-5E38-4587-BC7F-0141234C2F62@orthanc.ca> <6CEFF9B8-A62A-4616-A0FF-BDDDE1027A7E@FreeBSD.org> To: David Chisnall X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:45:28 -0000 On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your = systems, without any of your own code or any customisation? We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs. We are physically air-gapped from the internet, none of the "end users" = of the system have access to USB ports, and there are no electronic = devices allowed into the development shop. We have a scheme for bringing in software from /usr/ports, but it is = painful. And those ports can't necessarily walk on to all the systems = in the shop. (I don't make the rules. Suffice to say the company is = very paranoid about their code getting out into the wild.) Having RCS in the base system is very useful. We use it to track = changes to bits of /etc on the machines where we don't do wholesale = customizations. (Those ones get git, but they also get an install of = /usr/ports with a fully populated /usr/ports/distfiles.) So if nuking RCS is a case of "I don't use it," ... we do.