From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 24 15:02:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E75016A4DD
	for <ipfw@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:02:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFEC43D2D
	for <ipfw@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:02:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213])
	by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5OF7sTo047864
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:07:55 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i5OF27JM066625;
	Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:02:07 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from ru)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:02:01 +0300
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
Message-ID: <20040624150201.GA66542@ip.net.ua>
References: <20040624004039.A62893@xorpc.icir.org>
	<200406240929.i5O9TDBD000460@ns.networkersbg.com>
	<20040624103716.GA64935@ip.net.ua>
	<20040624120725.GA84753@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
	<20040624075007.A66175@xorpc.icir.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040624075007.A66175@xorpc.icir.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: tables in ipfw2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:02:22 -0000


--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:50:07AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:07:25PM +0200, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:37:16PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >=20
> > Hello,
> >=20
> > > > So you mean that it is only in 5.x branch.
> > > > Is there a patch for 4.10 RELENG ?
> > > >=20
> > > No, it's just not getting built by default in 4.x.
> > > In 4.x, you need IPFW2=3DYES in /etc/make.conf, and
> > > possibly ``options IPFW2'' instead of ``options
> > > IPFIREWALL'' in your kernel config file.
>=20
> it is "in addition to", not "instead of"
>=20
I have it "instead of" in my kernel configs, and nothing appears
to be broken.  I mean, no code checks for the IPFIREWALL #define,
and otherwise compiling empty ip_fw.o (when both IPFIREWALL and
IPFW2 are defined) into the kernel seems pointless to me.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFA2uzpqRfpzJluFF4RAuqmAJ9vKu31fqgA0m1VarL0gkD3OCPRZQCgkCMs
yn1stvBl7it0HsEK4/5y8rs=
=q346
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--