From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 10:52:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA7637B401 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ares.cs.Virginia.EDU (ares.cs.Virginia.EDU [128.143.137.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAC543F93 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:52:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nicolas@cs.Virginia.EDU) Received: from LITHIUM.chvlva.adelphia.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id h7AHqZL9026355 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:52:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:52:36 -0400 From: Nicolas Christin To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <475F6EFE-CB55-11D7-AAB4-000393AB4AD4@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: <0308101344350.3308@LITHIUM> References: <475F6EFE-CB55-11D7-AAB4-000393AB4AD4@wanadoo.fr> Organization: University of Virginia - CS Dept. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: ALTQ integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:52:40 -0000 Fabien, On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Fabien THOMAS wrote: > What is the status of the ALTQ framework integration into FreeBSD ? I refer you to the current threads in . The short answer is "some people are working on it". > OpenBSD have native support but i think the merge with pf is a bad idea > that do not allow third party classifier. Well - it has been discussed (especially on netbsd-tech, and sometimes in pretty harsh terms), and it is the road that is seemingly followed, according to the recent commits in the KAME tree. See for instance the changelog for July 10 at . Regards, -- Nicolas