From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 15:45:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B00516A4CE; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:45:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8D143D2F; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:45:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i05NimN1072102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:45:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05NiWMO027543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:44:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05NiVBE039847; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:44:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i05NiVFE039846; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:44:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:44:31 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20040105234430.GC39786@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20040105231533.GQ17023@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040105.162427.30502300.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040105233138.GR17023@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040105.163345.129782176.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040105233941.GB39786@cicely12.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105233941.GB39786@cicely12.cicely.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: ticso@cicely12.cicely.de cc: ticso@cicely.de cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Still IRQ routing problems with bridged devices. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 23:45:09 -0000 On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:39:42AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:33:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <20040105233138.GR17023@cicely12.cicely.de> > > Bernd Walter writes: > > : On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:24:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > : > In message: <20040105231533.GQ17023@cicely12.cicely.de> > > : > Bernd Walter writes: > > : > : The point is that it shouldn't take an IRQ for PCI which is configured > > : > : for an ISA device in device.hints. > > : > > > : > We don't do that. > > : > > : We do! > > : > > : /boot/device.hints: > > : hint.sio.0.irq="4" > > : > > : pci_cfgintr_virgin: using routable interrupt 4 > > : pci_cfgintr: 0:4 INTD routed to irq 4 > > > > Ah, I see what you are saying. That would be hard to implement. After rethinking - it wouldn't be a good idea either, because GENERIC.hints would block to many possible IRQs :( Too bad that ISA components have to be attached after PCI. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de