From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb 24 02:05:20 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id CAA12156 for current-outgoing; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 02:05:20 -0800
Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.142.36]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA12042 for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 02:01:13 -0800
Received: (from jhs@localhost) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id AAA16766; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:41:53 +0100
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:41:53 +0100
From: Julian Howard Stacey <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>
Message-Id: <199502212341.AAA16766@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: davidg@Root.COM
Subject: Re: Possible kern.maxproc fatal bug
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
> Perhaps making the map accomodate 2 or 3 times maxproc might be a compromise.

My acid test would be a fork going berserk recursively in user mode (no suid 0)
if it could withstand that, would be nice :-)
Julian S