From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  5 15:31:33 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9202B16A41F
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jan 2006 15:31:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from loukamenov@gmail.com)
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FD843D48
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jan 2006 15:31:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from loukamenov@gmail.com)
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so3229686nzo
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:31:27 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=RIXWfpQ1Y5dFyEVuJ+NVHkn0CqWPM38tNzygvDNv0H2g8HNcQogoGJ7c+ocN6B7epGzZHyy4YBb8Rf+2BugDPRpW4rY8XGIWkh5N1E9Lv1IAkWJRiGX+Ga09l+DKTw88O4Cxq5TUymrEnlY7bvimaLzqgvekxB+rB6aJ+TfmbkY=
Received: by 10.36.72.8 with SMTP id u8mr7055737nza;
	Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:31:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.153.20 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <76f962c60601050731x7a81bb57k@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:31:26 -0500
From: Lou Kamenov <loukamenov@gmail.com>
To: richard.kaestner@ycn.com
In-Reply-To: <200601051002.45590.richard.kaestner@ycn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <freebsd-fs.200601031949.22484.richard.kaestner@ycn.com>
	<200601041420.k04EK049049833@lurza.secnetix.de>
	<76f962c60601041453n1d195cd6s@mail.gmail.com>
	<200601051002.45590.richard.kaestner@ycn.com>
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: mapping [process|socket|...] to Filesystem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:31:33 -0000

On 05/01/06, Richard K=E4stner <richard.kaestner@ycn.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 23:53, Lou Kamenov wrote:
> > On 04/01/06, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> wrote:
[..]
> you seem to have experience with fuse,

Sorry. I haven't tested fuse4bsd thoroughly and I cannot comment, but
I've used the original Linux implementation some time ago.

> I could imagine, there is any negative impact on
> system operation, if connection to the black-box
> is flaky, slow, ... ?

That depends entirely on your design. Fuse filesystems run in user land.

> The least I want to accomplish, is a 'good idea' which renders
> the system unstable.

Rigorous tests can show that.
Fuse4bsd list is probably a more suitable place to discuss this.

best,
Lou