From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 10:18:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4844B16A41A for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andpet@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B4413C465 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andpet@telia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (81.233.14.209) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.3.129) (authenticated as u30405151) id 471DFA9D008FF5D7; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:08:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4747E99C.3090109@telia.com> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:06:36 +0100 From: Andreas Pettersson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mitchell Smith References: <00c401c82cc4$5bcd6a20$580116ac@mjspcbook> In-Reply-To: <00c401c82cc4$5bcd6a20$580116ac@mjspcbook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam Filter Efficiency X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:18:01 -0000 Mitchell Smith wrote: > ... > What I would like some feedback on is if anyone has already gone down this path and found one solution that performs better than another, or if anyone is > using a similar setup to ours and has found better ways to optimise it. > If I'm not mistaken SpamAssassin now has a short-circuit feature, enabling you to specify rules that should stop further rule checking immediately and flag it as spam. Could be useful if you see some certain patterns that you know for sure is spam. -- Andreas