From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jun 28 21:54:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C99037C3C6 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:54:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA83476; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:54:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA61948; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:54:33 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200006290454.WAA61948@harmony.village.org> To: Wes Peters Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:51:22 MDT." <395AD5CA.1A127F8@softweyr.com> References: <395AD5CA.1A127F8@softweyr.com> <39593208.7D132924@softweyr.com> <200006270744.BAA32993@harmony.village.org> <200006272328.RAA50308@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:54:33 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <395AD5CA.1A127F8@softweyr.com> Wes Peters writes: : I agree, and my legal counsel agrees as well. What he said, however, : is that he feels it is defensible in court, not that it is pretty : much lawsuit proof. He feels the 2-clause BSD license is lawsuit : proof. Which would you prefer? ;^) 2-clause BSD. :-) It appears that the LPRng folks have done that :-). Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message