From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 21 8:56:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0130937B408; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from aeimail.aei.ca (aeimail.aei.ca [206.123.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54E743FBD; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:56:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from shall.anarcat.ath.cx (2pysrks29i7p665b@dsl-133-253.aei.ca [66.36.133.253]) by aeimail.aei.ca (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id h2LGuNt08192; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:56:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from lenny.anarcat.ath.cx (lenny.anarcat.ath.cx [192.168.0.4]) by shall.anarcat.ath.cx (Postfix) with SMTP id 61110241; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:56:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by lenny.anarcat.ath.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:56:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:56:21 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Yar Tikhiy Cc: "Nikolay Y. Orlyuk" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build options for kernel modules Message-ID: <20030321165621.GD1174@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> References: <20030321153217.GA53518@comp.chem.msu.su> <20030321153907.GQ76182@asu.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> <20030321161658.GA56375@comp.chem.msu.su> <20030321162501.GC1174@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <20030321164741.GA57884@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030321164741.GA57884@comp.chem.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:47:42PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:01AM -0500, The Anarcat wrote: > > On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > >=20 > > > Yeah, it's all right to compile modules w/o the kernel, but that's > > > not exactly what I was asking about. My question was whether "option > > > FOO" lines from a kernel configuration file could influence modules. > >=20 > > I'm pretty sure they do. A great example is IPFIREWALL_* options: if > > they don't influence the module, I think we have a problem. ;) >=20 > My testing a yesterday's CURRENT has shown we did have the problem. > Everobody is invited to set "options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT" > and to load the resulting ipfw.ko on a remote machine without human > access ;-))) [small print: it's a joke, don't actually do that.] Woops. --=20 Nothing incites to money-crimes like great poverty or great wealth. - Mark Twain --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+e0Q1ttcWHAnWiGcRAqBTAJ47hg8p5fslG+ogFOJIIjT0jWnPDQCgjvVD mtlWKU2rzvoJ/QT1P6DvE1k= =IuaT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message