Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:36:15 +0300 From: Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net> To: Guy Brand <gb@unistra.fr> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net-im/ejabberd 2.0.5 to 2.1.0 Message-ID: <4B3319EF.8000001@haruhiism.net> In-Reply-To: <20091223214727.GS49041@unistra.fr> References: <4B27DCA4.1090308@haruhiism.net> <20091215191405.GK1378@unistra.fr> <4B27E0ED.4090606@haruhiism.net> <20091216124442.GW1378@unistra.fr> <4B2989FD.7020300@haruhiism.net> <20091223214727.GS49041@unistra.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24.12.2009 0:47, Guy Brand wrote: > About absolute pathnames, how should a port refer to /var/spool and >> /var/run? >> > I may be wrong, but the porters handbook doesn't tell a word about > that. So probably your deinstall file is ok. > I thought of using the localstatedir macro substitution, but it didn't work as I thought, and upon checking some other ports I found out that most of them use absolute references to /var as well. > By the way 2.1.1 of ejabberd is out, but I'm sure you already know > that. > Yes; the problem is that I've got a flight back home today so I've been busy preparing for the trip. As soon as I'm back in Japan, I'll make the necessary changes to the port's build files and post the updated version here. -- Kamigishi Rei KREI-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B3319EF.8000001>