Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flowtable_cleaner/flowtable_flush livelock Message-ID: <20101120165604.T24596@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <86pqu0nexd.fsf@kopusha.home.net> References: <86pqu0nexd.fsf@kopusha.home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hi,
> Running something like below under VirtualBox (CURRENT, VIMAGE)
...
> So the question is who is guilty in this situation? ULE? flowtable? Or
> jail/epair, which should not allow simultaneous entering of flowtable_flush?
In general: you for running an experimental feature;-)
Seriously, flowtable has a number of different problems:
1) you will leak neighbor entries still
2) I have patches for VIMAGE but if you are running VIMAGE you are
advised not to run flowtable.
3) FLOWTABLE should go from GENERIC but that's a different story.
I think net@ would have been a better initial place but since this
seems to be a problem when interacting with VIMAGE
freebsd-virtualization might be better.
What you could try is:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100216-10-ft-cv.diff
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
<ks> Going to jail sucks -- <bz> All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101120165604.T24596>