From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 15 14:45:42 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B42106566B;
	Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:45:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tingox@gmail.com)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2158FC08;
	Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:45:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so337322fga.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:45:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=1lNmLvY7PClPe2+MKLv4TaGGWRXK35S/ELZXeXclJXw=;
	b=ku1CIANO/HB+piECJiqQyquVeA4AA43atvLVt14HCoKcqZR7sXZgONdSlxBIsgUWEC
	bJUfD6zDjdrMdTiPZ9E8/2FnknQQ+yht4aNSbeWzOHDXwWuG4Paa7cXhEzWTQ47DTZAR
	YRXmuYLlObn9ejbjdaDwCUVtlPJ1nX9n7Ns4g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=oBJKTYGAve/YIhhSp8V4CO0oFcEW76+GbhVc5He19+19DxLEE79exbbMZ7xZoHjaDY
	Zly2CzWojBOmCXPjdhEhqjr6h9vlDyKJyva/iuzKIQMkSBxwm1BRRwPQEs8HGCj+xtE8
	hFrP0PYggOc8RZ4OYVGNKDiFJSheOUu/ADZU4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.5.23 with SMTP id 23mr2827006fat.53.1263566733701; Fri, 15 
	Jan 2010 06:45:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100115001412.138ed882@gumby.homeunix.com>
References: <ef8c8a881001141542n7d706477sf9c2258ead2c70c7@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B4FB10D.5040905@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100115001412.138ed882@gumby.homeunix.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:45:33 +0100
Message-ID: <ef8c8a881001150645kb0cc5fcpc37de51e77f72316@mail.gmail.com>
From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com>
To: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: demon@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin - why is it marked as broken on 8?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:45:42 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:29 -0500
> Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>
> > The CVS commit in question says that the breakage was reported by
> > pointyhat (FreeBSD package building cluster):
> >
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin/Makefile#rev1.28
> >
> > In fact, pav@ included the specific compiler error.  I wonder if there
> > was possibly a bug in the early 8.0 OS at that time (13 Jun 2009) that
> > caused the build failure.
> >
> > If you are able to build and run successfully under 8.0 now, I suggest
> > filing a PR with a patch to unbreak the port.
>
> I just tried it and it failed  on 8.0 (RELENGE_8_0), the OP is using
> 8-stable.
>

Well, shouldn't the port only be marked broken for RELENG_8_0 (and perhaps
-CURRENT) then, and not for RELENG_8?
I don't know how to do that, or I would file a PR.
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen