From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 31 20:19:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB98106566C for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@twisted.net) Received: from oz.twisted.net (oz.twisted.net [69.211.34.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AA78FC1A for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oz.twisted.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oz.twisted.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EC4FF1E8F; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:20:07 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from oz.twisted.net ([127.0.0.1]) by oz.twisted.net (oz.twisted.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VlF+oQRuI6R0; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:19:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from [172.16.0.5] (sindrome.twisted.net [172.16.0.5]) by oz.twisted.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F0BFCA440; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:19:52 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4D1E3A80.9060206@twisted.net> Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:18:08 -0600 From: Troy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <4D1DED89.8030408@twisted.net> <19742.3078.955695.526046@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <19742.3078.955695.526046@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc-4.4.6.20101012 marked broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: troy@twisted.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:19:51 -0000 nope. I just checked and deleted gcc44. Thanks for your clarification guys. On 12/31/2010 10:59 AM, Robert Huff wrote: > Gerald Pfeifer writes: > >> If you want to use GCC on FreeBSD, I recommend to go for >> lang/gcc45 (short: gcc45). I do not know what caused the >> installation of gcc44 on your system, but gcc45 should be >> strictly preferrable and not needed by anything else. > Root question: is there any program that has a specific > requirement for gcc44 - i,e, one that cannot be satisfied by gcc43 > or gcc45? > > > Robert Huff