From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 26 14:18:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6827337B422; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:18:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BEF9A1C75; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:18:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:18:38 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Will Andrews Cc: Maxim Sobolev , Thomas Gellekum , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/audio Makefileports/audio/openal Makefile ports/audio/openal/files md5ports/audio/openal/patches patch-configure.in patch-src:alc:alc_context.cpatch-src:threads:posixthreads.c ports/audio/openal/pkg COMMENT ... Message-ID: <20000926171838.F34501@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200009261212.FAA21539@freefall.freebsd.org> <39D09D29.D8BB4D9A@FreeBSD.org> <20000926082735.Z30130@puck.firepipe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000926082735.Z30130@puck.firepipe.net>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 08:27:35AM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 08:27:35AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > The current rules for patches are rather sketchy. I don't really care > much as long as they are applied in the right order. Hence, I doubt the > rules for patchfile naming needs to be enforced even if it is in the > handbook. I will, however, enforce to anal retentive levels certain > other rules. So we pick which rules to follow based on your perception on how concrete they are? How's this sound: we do what sobomax said and follow all the rules until they get changed the right way. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message