From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 00:21:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D7D106566C for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.246.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7488FC08 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parancell.ongs.co.jp (dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp [202.216.246.94]) by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9E24125422; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:21:45 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:21:45 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO To: Sevan / Venture37 Message-Id: <20120411092145.3eccb9e4.daichi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F84B0AF.7010401@gmail.com> References: <566771C2-84CA-4824-AE99-38EB5DE1F786@gmail.com> <20120410104521.ba15b1c3.daichi@freebsd.org> <4F84B0AF.7010401@gmail.com> Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: DTrace on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:21:53 -0000 On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:14:07 +0100 Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > On 10/04/2012 02:45, Daichi GOTO wrote: > > Hi, > > > > From the DTrace tutorial at AsiaBSDCon 2012, it is a CDDL > > license issue. > > Hi Daichi, > I wonder which clause/aspect of the license is a problem? I do not know well. And I think Tod McQuillin could help you. (http://2012.asiabsdcon.org/timetable.html#T1B) > We've been distributing dtrace as part of our source since FreeBSD 7.1 > so the terms of license must have been acceptable for inclusion in our > tree & redistribution in source for each release since. > I've been reading the CCDL license just now & clause 3.5 on Distribution > of executable vesions states > > You may distribute the Executable form of the Covered Software under the > terms of this License or under the terms of a license of Your choice, > which may contain terms different from this License, provided that You > are in compliance with the terms of this License and that the license > for the Executable form does not attempt to limit or alter the > recipient’s rights in the Source Code form from the rights set forth in > this License. If You distribute the Covered Software in Executable form > under a different license, You must make it absolutely clear that any > terms which differ from this License are offered by You alone, not by > the Initial Developer or Contributor. You hereby agree to indemnify the > Initial Developer and every Contributor for any liability incurred by > the Initial Developer or such Contributor as a result of any such terms > You offer. > > This shouldn't pose any legal problems for the project if DTrace was > redistributed in binary form should it? > > > Addition from my experiences, some applicaions can not be > > built on DTrace/UserlandDTrace-enabled system (VBox is) and > > Userland dtrace is still unstable. > > I see, was the virtual box issue recently, I'm pretty sure I was able to > build virtual box on a DTrace enabled system in the past couple of months. You did? I'm so jealous! > Sevan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Daichi GOTO (daichi) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve