Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:19:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org> To: Justin Mason <jm@dogma.slashnull.org> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD port of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (continued) Message-ID: <20040926001136.E5738@prime.gushi.org> In-Reply-To: <20040926013202.GA28656@dogma.slashnull.org> References: <20040924043002.Q78840@prime.gushi.org> <2CE7048C26D5B2A38706C484@vanvoght.phoenix.volant.org> <FAEF3DFFE0FD6ECBA7B62649@vanvoght.phoenix.volant.org> <20040925131746.R5738@prime.gushi.org> <20040926013202.GA28656@dogma.slashnull.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Justin Mason wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 01:21:19PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> >> Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast >> module? I can create it if you like. >> >> (I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating a port 00 >> is there one?) >> >> A menu-based config (like the one for the mod_php) port would probably be >> useful as well, to enable things like SSL, and database support. >> > > guys -- bear in mind that IP:C:F is an optional > module, so I wouldn't worry about it too much. I know, but it should be there for the sake of completeness. I read that the country filters are off by default, how does one turn them on? -Dan > > --j. > >> >>> +-le 25/09/2004 02:20 -0700, Pat Lashley ?crivait : >>> | --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold >>> | <mat@mat.cc> wrote: >>> | >>> |> +-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit : >>> |>| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update >>> |>| to the existing SA port; due to the lack of backwards compatability >>> |>| in the API. For example, it would break the Exim port which by >>> |>| default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still >>> |>| build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.) >>> |> >>> |> I don't think we will keep the old spamassassin. The 2.64 version will >>> be >>> |> the only one working with 5.005_03, but well... It's not possible to >>> have >>> |> SA3 work with 5.005_03 (believe me, I tried). >>> |> So, a few days before committing the SA3 update, I'll send a mail with >>> the >>> |> patch I plan to commit to maintainers of ports depending on SA264 for >>> them >>> |> to update/patch/whatever. >>> | >>> | That seems like an awfully short transition period. Why not >>> | a separate 3.0 port for a while; with the old one being deprecated? >>> | Then remove the 2.64 port once the dependant ports have been updated >>> | and in the field long enough for some serious testing? >>> >>> I don't want to have a SA3 port, I'm more in favor of a SA264 port designed >>> for perl 5.005_03 as the databases/p5-DBI-137 port. This is still under >>> discussion. >>> >>> -- >>> Mathieu Arnold >>> >> >> -- >> >> "We need another cat. This one's retarded." >> >> -Cali, March 8, 2003 (3:43 AM) >> >> --------Dan Mahoney-------- >> Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek >> Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC >> ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM >> Site: http://www.gushi.org >> --------------------------- > -- "Hey, call me anything you like. I'm Dan to my friends, gushi to my close friends, 'hey, you' to my girlfriend, 'mrrow?' to my cat, and 'why the hell is the router on fire?' to my job. -Dan Mahoney 12/2/02 --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040926001136.E5738>