From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 27 21:49:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA28525 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:49:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from mail.netcetera.dk (root@sleipner.netcetera.dk [194.192.97.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA28520 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:49:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leifn@swimsuit.roskildebc.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.netcetera.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with UUCP id GAA15611 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 06:45:21 +0100 Received: by swimsuit.roskildebc.dk (0.99.970109) id AA02005; 28 Oct 97 06:42:46 +0100 From: leifn@swimsuit.roskildebc.dk (Leif Neland) Date: 27 Oct 97 18:07:21 +0100 Subject: 2000 Compliance / dates / time libs Message-ID: <289_9710280642@swimsuit.roskildebc.dk> References: Organization: Fidonet: UNIX-sysadm søger job To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 29 Feb 00 01:13:57 steve@visint.co.uk (2:234/49.99) wrote to Leif Neland regarding 2000 Compliance / dates / time libs in area "freebsd-questions" s> I just set my clock to february 29 2000. Is this valid ? Dates dividable by 4 are leap years. Except years dividable by 100 are not. Except years dividable by 400 are anyway. So 2000 are a leap year, 1990 and 2100 are not. Leif Neland leifn@image.dk --- |Fidonet: Leif Neland 2:234/49 |Internet: leifn@image.dk