From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 15 18:07:48 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C55416A401;
	Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E636A43D48;
	Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged))
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3FI6PPn032677;
	Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:06:25 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:06:40 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20060415.120640.28764842.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: deischen@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604151358210.9220@sea.ntplx.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141439280.3685@sea.ntplx.net>
	<20060415.113630.81407700.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0604151358210.9220@sea.ntplx.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: victor@bsdes.net, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Missing dependencies on shared libraries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:07:48 -0000

In message: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604151358210.9220@sea.ntplx.net>
            Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: 
: > In message: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141439280.3685@sea.ntplx.net>
: >            Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
: > : On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
: > :
: > : > Hi,
: > : > I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
: > : > libraries:
: > : >
: > : > pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
: > : > /usr/lib/libfetch.so:
: > : >        libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000)
: > : >        libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000)
: > : >
: > : > does anyone know why?
: > :
: > : AFAIK, it's being worked on.  It's not just libc either, -pthread
: > : also has to start linking to libpthread.
: >
: > We don't record libc dependencies into shared libraries right now.  If
: > we did, that would create some problems and solve some problems.  With
: > symbol versioning, it most likely will become moot, since we'll never
: > have to bump libc major version again...
: 
: kan stated he was working on doing this, which is what I was
: referring to above.

That makes sense.  If you explicitly include libc on the command line
to build the library, it is included...

Warner