From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:44:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484DE16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D880D43D1D for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:21830 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CC1Q1-0000Z9-QW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:18 +0000 Message-ID: <41586D91.9040508@zonnet.nl> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:44:17 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040908 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Question List References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4157A0F9.6010007@zonnet.nl> <20040927090142.1719d106.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> <764C01E1-10B9-11D9-8AA7-000393681B06@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <764C01E1-10B9-11D9-8AA7-000393681B06@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [OT] Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:19 -0000 Hi Doug, Point taken. Wrong example, imho, but point taken. ;-) > They will have no problem > convincing Joe Sub-Average juror (of which there will be more than > enough to go around) that you were the cause of Joe Average computer > users' loss of his entire retirement savings. I have just enough faith in even the American legal system that the judge will rule that Joe Average should not have put his entire retirement savings on an email line, but rather some real time (or as close as can be), secured communication channel. I may be wrong though, who knows. If what you say were real life, what about the standard 4 hour delay in the default 'deferred' message to Joe Average? Don't answer that. This is turning OT way too fast (my bad). Bye... Nico