From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Mar 6 18:10: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769ED37B718 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 18:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f272A2h65892; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 18:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 18:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103070210.f272A2h65892@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Mike Pelley" Subject: Re: bin/25494: fetch uses environment variable FTP_PROXY, ftp/lynx use ftp_proxy Reply-To: "Mike Pelley" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/25494; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Mike Pelley" To: "Dag-Erling Smorgrav" Cc: Subject: Re: bin/25494: fetch uses environment variable FTP_PROXY, ftp/lynx use ftp_proxy Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 21:00:27 -0500 > Is this really the correct fix? Does lynx really apply the exact same > semantics to ftp_proxy / http_proxy as libfetch does do FTP_PROXY / > HTTP_PROXY? ftp is in the base system and it also uses ftp_proxy/http_proxy. The use of these environment variables is very similar between the two (and lynx) as far as I can tell - but perhaps I'm missing something? I think consistency is important - it seems incovenient to have two variables that do the same thing. > (me, I'm tempted to say the correct fix is "don't use lynx, use w3m") This doesn't quite seem relevant, but ftp should be enough to justify it regardless. Mike. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message