Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:44:21 -0600
From:      Drew Sanford <lauasanf@bellsouth.net>
To:        Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Afterstep port
Message-ID:  <3A11A425.584AA377@bellsouth.net>
References:  <20001114114037.A46808@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> Is there any sense to keep x11-wm/afterstep port?
> It represents an old 1.0 version, while the latest stable version is 1.8.4
> (afterstep-stable port).
> 
> If there will be no objections, I propose to remove x11-wm/afterstep
> and to repo-copy afterstep-stable -> afterstep.

I personally think this is a bad idea, unless you plan to keep an
afterstep 1.0 port somewhere. Its a simple, lightweight, very functional
manager. Not being able to simply type 'make install' to add it to a new
machine would severely increase the amount of typing I have to do to set
up a new machine:)

-- 
Drew Sanford
lauasanf@bellsouth.net or drew@planetwe.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A11A425.584AA377>