Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:44:21 -0600 From: Drew Sanford <lauasanf@bellsouth.net> To: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Afterstep port Message-ID: <3A11A425.584AA377@bellsouth.net> References: <20001114114037.A46808@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > Hello! > > Is there any sense to keep x11-wm/afterstep port? > It represents an old 1.0 version, while the latest stable version is 1.8.4 > (afterstep-stable port). > > If there will be no objections, I propose to remove x11-wm/afterstep > and to repo-copy afterstep-stable -> afterstep. I personally think this is a bad idea, unless you plan to keep an afterstep 1.0 port somewhere. Its a simple, lightweight, very functional manager. Not being able to simply type 'make install' to add it to a new machine would severely increase the amount of typing I have to do to set up a new machine:) -- Drew Sanford lauasanf@bellsouth.net or drew@planetwe.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A11A425.584AA377>