From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 09:20:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240B716A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:20:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hkuhp12.hku.hk (hkuhp12.hku.hk [147.8.2.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E84F43D54 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leonardo@mcomo.com) Received: from v505 ([147.8.108.243]) by hkuhp12.hku.hk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j389JsUS017387; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:19:55 +0800 (EAT) From: "Leonardo" To: "=?UTF-8?Q?'=22Dag-Erling_Sm=E9=B7=A8grav=22'?=" Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:19:52 +0800 Message-ID: <001501c53c1c$2269d840$f36c0893@v505> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <86zmwaden4.fsf@xps.des.no> X-MailScanner: 0 X-MailScanner-From: leonardo@mcomo.com cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SATA Raid support problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:20:14 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: "Dag-Erling Sm=E9=B7=A8grav" [mailto:des@des.no]=20 Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:13 PM To: Leonardo Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA Raid support problem "Leonardo" writes: > I am using a HP ML110, there are a Promise FastTrack S150 SX4-M. When = I > install the FreeBSD 5.3, I find that the FreeBSD cannot recognize this > SATA Raid card. What can I do for troubleshoot. The S150SX4 is not supported in 5.3. There is limited support in -CURRENT. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no Thx for ur support. That mean if I use the -current version, the problem will solved??