From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 12 23:11:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA27023 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 23:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA27013 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 23:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wyWce-00039R-00; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 23:09:32 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 23:09:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Danny Braniss cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PROXY ARP In-Reply-To: <199708130500.IAA19683@sexta.cs.huji.ac.il> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Danny Braniss wrote: > In message you write: > } > }On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Danny Braniss wrote: > } > }> Looking at the kernel sources, i see that FreeBsd has fix so > }> as not to send ARP Reply to the 'wrong' interface, but there are, > }> IMHO, some other problems. > } > } The whole idea of bridging has some problems. Route and/or switch > }instead. > } > }Tom > } > > Agreed, but in my case there is no such box available - im trying to > bridge an ethernet-lan with a 2gb network (Myrinet). If you can connect the myrinet to the FreeBSD can't you just route between the two? > danny > > Tom