From owner-freebsd-alpha  Tue Sep  5 11:14: 1 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD1437B423
	for <alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  5 Sep 2000 11:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeppo.feral.com (IDENT:mjacob@zeppo [192.67.166.71])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19436;
	Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:13:55 -0700
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com>,
	Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: what was the last patch you sent out?
In-Reply-To: <14773.14047.750044.76586@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009051109000.11930-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


> 
> Matthew Jacob writes:
>  > 
>  > Well, Rawhide boots. I sure wish I knew what the authors intended by saying
>  > "physical bus". I don't seems quite correct since we seem to have two
> 
> I think its trying to map back to the DEQ SRM terminology where you
> can have  a "bus 0"  on many different hoses.   Eg, its directly tied
> to the nexus & not behind a ppb.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Hrmm. Okay. I guess so. 

> 
> 
>  > different "physical bus" zeros here. On puropose I very carefully don't have
>  > overlapping cards (as in, same slot, different busses).
> 
> Actually, that would be the most interesting to test.

Obviously. But i wanted to get something booted with a kernel newer than 12
days old first.

-matt




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message