From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 02:24:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F82916A421 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@mail.gbch.net) Received: from gw.gbch.net (gw.gbch.net [203.143.238.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADFBF13C465 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@mail.gbch.net) Received: (qmail 24166 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2007 12:24:29 +1000 Received: from joker.gbch.net (172.16.1.10) by gw.gbch.net with SMTP; 17 Oct 2007 12:24:29 +1000 Received: (qmail 96650 invoked by uid 1001); 17 Oct 2007 12:24:29 +1000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:24:29 +1000 From: Greg Black To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20071004165755.GA1049@pp.htv.fi> <47120D83.1010703@FreeBSD.org> <20071015203202.GA17964@pp.htv.fi> <20071016004637.GA79351@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20071016185714.GB2186@pp.htv.fi> <20071016130146.pfyan4vs5cwgsoc0@webmail.1command.com> <20071016202251.GC4047@lava.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071016202251.GC4047@lava.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i; gjb-muttsend.sh 1.7 2004-10-05 X-Uptime: 64 days X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 i386 X-Location: Brisbane, Australia; 27.49841S 152.98439E X-URL: http://www.gbch.net/gjb.html X-Blog: http://www.gbch.net/gjb/blog/ X-Image-URL: http://www.gbch.net/gjb/gjb-auug048.gif X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: EBB2 2A92 A79D 1533 AC00 3C46 5D83 B6FB 4B04 B7D6 X-Request-PGP: http://www.gbch.net/keys/4B04B7D6.asc Subject: Re: Reproducable, possibly NFS related, fatal double fault in 6.2-R-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:24:32 -0000 On 2007-10-16, Clifton Royston wrote: > Thanks for this very timely mention! The cluster of servers I am > about to upgrade from 4.8 to 6.2 relies heavily on > NFS to an old Netapp. If I have got to disable rpc_lockd and > rpc_statd, it's good to know that now! > > Can I ask, can anybody confirm that they're running 6.2 on NFS > successfully *with* lockd and statd? I have this combination running without any drama on a couple of networks, so I doubt veery much if that is the fatal combination. Greg