Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:22:38 -0600 From: Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Aldis Berjoza <graudeejs@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax. (Copied from freebsd-pf) Message-ID: <50ABCA6E.6030408@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnk5cUAOzf-w%2BiR__0Rv-=vobs5P7yhvimbuCy9B8uBGA@mail.gmail.com> References: <op.wn1vxr1jjfousr@box.dlink.com> <CABzXLYPYtQanh5O6%2BTH0=e46P990iXcDoB0apY_BOtzmn9-S7Q@mail.gmail.com> <50ABAF8E.3020101@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <50ABB0C7.7070404@gmail.com> <1023391353430321@web2h.yandex.ru> <50ABC214.9060800@gmail.com> <CAF6rxgnk5cUAOzf-w%2BiR__0Rv-=vobs5P7yhvimbuCy9B8uBGA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/20/2012 11:51 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 20 November 2012 12:47, Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> wrote: >> Nonsense. More options are always preferable to fewer options. > Even when those options must be maintained? Documented? Bug fixed? > > The ones who want the old pf can maintain it.. those who want the new one, can maintain *it*. I, for one, would prefer the new one eventually replace the old one, but there should definitely be a transition period, similar to how pkgng is going in. Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50ABCA6E.6030408>