From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jun 18 17:27:11 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA12612
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 17:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA12607
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 17:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA04124; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:27:04 -0600
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:27:04 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199606190027.SAA04124@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Robert Withrow <bwithrow@BayNetworks.com>
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD 2.1 generate executables for BSDI?
In-Reply-To: <199606190013.UAA27443@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com>
References: <199606190013.UAA27443@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com>
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Can I convince FreeBSD to generate a static image that
> BSDI can be persuaded to run?  Or is this a one-way
> street into FreeBSD?

Unless you can convince the BSDi folks to emulate our system calls, this
is a one-way street.


Nate