From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 29 23:05:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2285193 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB79147C for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3TN5wXF037493 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:05:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199671] [patch] memory leak in cam scsi Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:05:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pfg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:05:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199671 --- Comment #14 from Pedro F. Giffuni --- (In reply to cartwright from comment #13) Comments for things that don't exist and don't help development in any way are generally considered noise. There is the commit history and this bug report which serve as reference. The bug is in the static analyzer so I annotated it in Coverity. Clang doesn't currently have tags for this type of errors. Of course if many people are looking at the issue and repeatedly try to fix what is not broken it may be better to add a comment but we currently don't have many people checking those reports (most FreeBSD developers are indeed perfect ;) ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.