From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 12 2:50:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk [194.128.162.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F7E37BB5E; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:50:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adam@algroup.co.uk) Received: from algroup.co.uk ([192.168.192.2]) by eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA11406; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:50:06 GMT Message-ID: <38F446C7.192EF4E5@algroup.co.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:49:59 +0100 From: Adam Laurie X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Cc: Ben Laurie , Dirk Froemberg , "David O'Brien" , greg@greg.rim.or.jp, sumikawa@FreeBSD.ORG, hetzels@westbend.net, rse@engelschall.com, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, winter@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, Adam Laurie Subject: Re: apache13-php4 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Hmm. And what about the one where Apache-SSL replaces both > > apache13-modssl and apache13-ssl? Why do you consider Apache-SSL to > > need an exception, but not mod_ssl? I trust you are aware that both > > need Apache to be patched before they work? > > The difference being that we can always patch the Apache13 port so that it > will work with mod_ssl if the user decides to compile it in the future and > Apache-SSL doesn't work as an APXS DSO module AFAIK. > > Right? I will leave Ben to answer this - however, this still doesn't explain the fundamental "requirement" to have apache-ssl only exist if it can be unified with your "new scheme". There are many ports that provide the same functionality with different software. apache-ssl and mod_ssl are two different products. Or are you saying that the ports tree is going to be trawled, and all ports that (in your opinion) duplicate functionality are to be deleted? Shock horror! I've just noticed there's a duplicate operating system! Linux does The Same Thing(tm) as FreeBSD - we'd better delete one of them! Doh! cheers, Adam -- Adam Laurie Tel: +44 (181) 742 0755 A.L. Digital Ltd. Fax: +44 (181) 742 5995 Voysey House Barley Mow Passage http://www.aldigital.co.uk London W4 4GB mailto:adam@algroup.co.uk UNITED KINGDOM PGP key on keyservers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message