From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 06:37:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E85106564A; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 06:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@yamagi.org) Received: from mail.yamagi.overkill.yamagi.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:121:2102:1::7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293AC8FC13; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 06:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:5c0:150f:8700:223:54ff:fe31:a012] (unknown [IPv6:2001:5c0:150f:8700:223:54ff:fe31:a012]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yamagi.overkill.yamagi.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F04D016663D1; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 08:37:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 08:37:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Yamagi Burmeister X-X-Sender: yamagi@saya.home.yamagi.org To: YongHyeon PYUN In-Reply-To: <20110401185357.GA15910@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Message-ID: References: <20110330173145.GB8601@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20110330202858.GC8601@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20110331171302.GA11981@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20110331181651.GB11981@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20110331183054.GC11981@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20110401185357.GA15910@michelle.cdnetworks.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Yamagi Burmeister , yongari@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel memory corruption(?) with age(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 06:37:42 -0000 On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:59:12PM +0200, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> >>>> Thanks a lot! It seems the L1 controller has data corruption issue >>>> when 64bit DMA addressing is used. Try this one. >>> >>> Oops, there was a bug in previous patch. >>> Try this instead. >> >> Okay, that patch seems to do the trick. This was just a short test run >> of about one hour with just 50gb copied, but without the patch the >> system would have crashed in the first 20 minutes. I'll do a more >> comprehensive test over night and report back tomorrow morning. >> > > Fix committed to HEAD(r220249, r220252). > Thanks a lot for testing! No problem. -- Homepage: www.yamagi.org Jabber: yamagi@yamagi.org GnuPG/GPG: 0xEFBCCBCB